Skip to main content

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Hyld

1
Off-Topic Discussions / Re: The truth about Battle Smurf
however the current LEGAL limits in the UK are in contrast with the tendencies in human history and in most other countries.... as most things in the UK and the US, they are more the reflection of a decadent and confused society.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent

The current legal limits in the UK (16 years old as the age of consent without restrictions) match 64 other countries in the world.  48 have 18 as the unrestricted age of consent (Germany is one of these). 2 have the age of 17. 24 have the age at 15. 30 have the age at 14. 4 at 13. 14 countries that have NO age of consent (the only requirement being that the child is married.) The US unrestricted age depends on the state, ranging from 16 -18. Same with Mexico and Australia.

Looks like you're just making shit up again.

Simplified chart; i.e. in the chart you posted the AOC in Nigeria is placed at 18 years, while there are completely different reports:

https://www.ageofconsent.net/world

http://www.ibtimes.co.in/nigerian-senate-lowers-age-consent-sex-18-11-faces-backlash-635241

So is it 11 or 18? To be honest I think 11 is a scandal anyway, even considering Afro maturing earlier than whites and Asians.

But it was not really my point what some jurist/politicians recently  stated...as most of this is to follow the latest influence/trend.
I.e. Gay marriage is the latest nonsense successfully pushed in the last 3 decades by the western "elites", while (traditional) heterosexual polygamy is frowned upon but at the same time lose poly amorous Hollywood style lifestyles are celebrated by the UK tabloids......

My point is and remains that science and history proves that humans males and females are meant and accustomed to reach interaction at different ages, rather than the artificial 18.

As stated I gave a college exam on this matter so I know a bit more than the average Joe, but I understand most people just rely on the local law or on what the newspapers tell them to be "good".



Regards
HG
2
Off-Topic Discussions / Re: The truth about Battle Smurf
The major thing for me, is that if you're battling these thoughts - then you've severely missed the mark. The people I knew in highschool that dated younger - and continued to aim for the barely legal long after highschool - were losers. .....


Most males I have met that were attracted by older females had a clear Oedipus complex and other issues, including insecurity...basically they were looking for a mammy. All normal people I have met tend to look for a younger partner (if they are males)  and for a more mature partner (if they are females). This is a constant in all human history due to different factors..

Relationships with age disparity of all kinds have been observed with both men and women as the older or younger partner. In various cultures, older men and younger women often seek one another for sexual or marital relationships.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_disparity_in_sexual_relationships

Other research in modern day Sweden has shown that the ideal reproductive match is for a man to marry a woman six years his junior.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/what-is-the-best-age-difference-for-husband-and-wife/



Now things might be changing, or better, political correctness and delusional feminism tries to push what are, imo, unnatural trends on decadent societies ("US-Uk Celebrities are the biggest bad examples for us), but the natural trend is difficult to subvert completely.

As explained, NORMAL men look for healthy and young females, NORMAL females look for mature and smart males, not kids. Obviously (together with exceptions) there are and there have always been limits to these age differences and age of consents, after which we clearly talk of paedophilia, however the current LEGAL limits in the UK are in contrast with the tendencies in human history and in most other countries.... as most things in the UK and the US, they are more the reflection of a decadent and confused society.

This is in general terms, I am not interested in this joke debate about taped comments etc.

Regards
HG
3
Obama & Clinton Actually SUPPORT Trump's Jerusalem Policy!

Check from Minute 8:30

https://youtu.be/t2LOWfWB11s?t=520

99% of US politicians support anything Israel requires.....GOOOD Boys...do what you are told!!! Ah yes...and what is "in The Bible"...well in the Old Testament....that is the only part of the Bible the US "Christians" remember....

Regards
HG
4
It has happened again: yet another international poll finds that the US is viewed by peoples around the world to be the biggest threat to world peace.

https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2017/08/07/polls-us-greatest-threat-to-peace-world-today.html

I know that the clueless (I am not trying to insult, I am only using the term that best depicts the average American) Yank has no means to understand or agree on this, as he lives in a complete bubble, has hardly any contacts with (or even knowledge of) the outer world, relies on Hollywood and the US MSM plus grows up with this brash and childish idea to be the "greatest"...while the correct term would have been "with the most powerful weaponry and largest economy"


The map shows the results of a 2013 (pre-Trump) WIN/Gallup International survey asking people which country they felt was the greatest threat to world peace.
http://brilliantmaps.com/threat-to-peace/


Regards
HG
5

Did you really link Tucker videos Lol? What are you in 90 year old lady living in Arizona


Tucker Carlson in well respected from all sides, in fact many Democrats/Liberals etc go to his show; furthermore many times he is quite critical of BOTH sides or of his (supposed) side; he even claimed that Comey's public way of dealing with the Clinton Email scandal was unfair and damaging.

There are always intelligent people on all sides that are able to make good and honest points (and Carlson is considered to be one of this), and at the same time there are narrow minded people that look at the "labels" rather than at the substance....clearly you are one of them....

Here is a similar point from a LEFT wing and DEMOCRAT blogger
Jimmy Dore:



 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=GblPzMMrAIM

Regards
HG
6
Off-Topic Discussions / Re: The truth about Battle Smurf
Okay Hyld but he had so many opportunities to drop the topic and they tried to stop him but nope he continues. He was actually so invested in this conversation that he couldn't let it go until he told everyone how he keeps a picture of a girlfriend he had when he was 13 and how he continues reliving some sexual fantasy through it.

First he says it like if you don't know how old a girl is, then he says if it was him now (then 23) he would do the 13 year old girlfriend as she was at 13. I mean at what point do you force yourself to think about sex with a 13 year old, that in itself is messed up. When I see 13 year olds I think about my future kids not about having sex with them. It's so dumb on so many levels.

at first I was like hmm this is really grey maybe he's just obsessed with some girl he dated when he was a kid so he's trying to relive that in some weird way and ends up trying to justify it with terrible arguments. But then I let it sink in for a day and no it's just fucked. Like he actually cared about this conversation, it wasn't like he was being trolled or trolling himself.

Greetings,

Perhaps, however I did not hear the entire conversation....because:

1) It is none of my business to listen to (not to mention to post) conversations to which I am not privy
2) I do not know the entire context or any previous comment etc.
3) I (and the time-wasters he talked to and especially the one that "turned him in") am/are no psychologist...and he could have been trolling or have drunk too much, for all I know.
4) Small minds discuss people,  average minds discuss events, great minds discuss ideas... and I add, minus sapiens rush to bash and insult people..not that I am a great mind, but let us all try to better ourselves.

Edit: So I am more interested in the real (and normal) nature of male/female consent/access....rather than what a particular time and space has decided to be "Morally right"...

And no, sorry, there are 13 year old who look and think as 20yo and there are 20y.o. who are babies


Regards
HG
7
Off-Topic Discussions / Re: The truth about Battle Smurf
Age of consent:

Nigeria 11
Angola 12
Niger 13
Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic 13
Burkina Faso Africa 13


Philippines 12
Japan 13


Portugal Italy Germany Austria Serbia Lichtenstein, Macedonia Montenegro Hungary Estonia San Marino Bulgaria Bosnia/Erzegovina Serbia: 14


Quote
"In some countries, there is no legal age of consent"

https://www.ageofconsent.net/world

Quote
In the 12th century, Gratian, the influential founder of canon law in medieval Europe, accepted age of puberty for marriage to be around twelve for girls and around 14 for boys but acknowledged consent to be meaningful if both children were older than seven years of age.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent

Apologies to anyone from Nigeria, Angola Niger etc. many rush and unpleasant words have been uttered implicitly against you, but I can assure you it is just the simple mindedness of some people here who are unable to reason, let alone debate without going on an ape rampage...you see, friends,  they "reason" a bit like this:

"I saw it on the TV"...or..."they told me at school here"...or..."the cool guys told me this" or (better)..."the law in the country where ME LIVES states this"....or (worse) "ME SAW someone being beaten for something of the sort" and think this is a worldwide accepted and scientifically based rule and a moral obligation to foul mouth anyone related to a vaguely similar pattern.

BattleSmurf, may I say, stay away from those chat channels, they are the paradise of nolifers and minus sapiens.

@Ub3rgames you should ban anyone that posts private conversations clearly without consent of all involved.

Regards
HG



8
to OP, please no intercourse with the fast mounts AKA as Goats, please...ok just joking.

Regards
HG
9
Off-Topic Discussions / Re: The truth about Battle Smurf
All this current age limit is, once again, a politically correct fiction.

Regards
HG

...

Good you posted NOTHING, reflects your knowledge on the subject...are you not gay? What do you even know about attraction between a male and a female?

Regards
HG
10
Off-Topic Discussions / Re: The truth about Battle Smurf
Sad someone tapes and releases without knowledge and consent from all parties involved.

"Age consent" is different in any country and established arbitrarily by different factors, political, historical, cultural, religious, ideological etc., in some countries is 12 or 14, others 18, for other things it is 21...nothing "scientific" about this.

What is obvious (and scientifically provable) is that girls mature both emotionally and physically earlier than men, in fact even in Europe girls used to be married at 15 or 16 (and even earlier in the past) to much older men.

This has changed due to LEGAL reasons following "egalitarian" ideology stating that Men and Women are equal (which we all know is not true)...furthermore there are even racial differences, afro people tend to mature earlier.

Men are attracted by youth in a "girl", women mainly by quite different things, including their partner being "mature" (in many aspects, including physical) , that is why normally a girl is younger than the male in a couple and the women are stressed to death to look young and are happy to be called "girl" while a man prefers to be called a MAN rather than a boy

Even Walt Disney had something to say about this, and no scandal up to this day:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0jID_rQUN9w

All this current age limit is, once again, a politically correct fiction. I actually gave an exam in College on History of Marriage (age consent etc included, cultural aspects etc). What is odd is not Smurfs honest position, but the usual sheep attitude to whatever is the current trend, worshiping it as the given truth.

Regards
HG
12
The thirteen patriarchs and church heads in Jerusalem have written an open letter to US President Donald Trump, telling him that his decision to recognize its status as Israel's capital will cause "irreparable harm."

"We are certain that such steps will yield increased hatred, conflict, violence and suffering in Jerusalem and the Holy Land, moving us farther from the goal of unity and deeper toward destructive division," wrote the leaders of the Greek Orthodox, Coptic, Catholic, and other branches of Christianity that are represented in the city.

"Our solemn advice and plea is for the United States to continue recognizing the present international status of Jerusalem. Any sudden changes would cause irreparable harm," reads the letter, which insists that "the Holy City can be shared."


https://www.rt.com/news/412159-christians-jerusalem-trump-capital/

The US (and the American so called Christians) seem to care only of Israeli Jews...their entire foreign policy in the Middle East is for the benefit of Israel.....fact is they are made so unaware that the local Christians  have been methodically discriminated by the "Jewish State"... and in fact team up with the Muslims in all Middle East states, including Lebanon, Syria, Iraq......the cliques in power in the  US have even taken over most "Born Again Christians" and Co groups and make them think that "The Muzlims" are the Enemy of Christians...while this is the case only for the Islamist Terrorist so called Muslims (a creation of Saudi money and hypocrisy).

Regards
HG
13
General Discussion / Re: Any changes to bunnyjumping?

Well sadly, until BH is gone, I know 4 guys I game with regularly that said BH is a make or break deal for them and their decision to ever come back and invest time in the game. These are fellow DF1 vets , I talk to on a daily basis still. I would imagine if my core group of friends, has 4/5  that say BH is an issue keeping them from coming back, there are many others out there with similar thoughts, that do not lurk these forums and post feedback.

Greetings,

You can tell them that HG was probably the most vocal and relentless critic of BH, on DFO, DFUW, ROA, irritating very much the cool/GTA style of RL losers  (no offence, and anyway In Game winners) that thrive on this game breaking crap... but after trying how it has been nerfed/fine tuned in DnD he does not find it such a big issue any more at all

Regards
HG


Really doubt anyone remembers you from OG Darkfall, be it ingame or forums. All I know is that you are a weirdo that spam off-topic here on ND with mostly crazy shit.

It was the main topic I pushed on the forums...having said this I have really little interest (and expectations) to be "famous" in a MMORPG where your identity is actually hidden...unless one is a bit delusional and identifies himself with the only thing he has in life: a MMORPG.....anyway mine was just a manner of speaking. Thank you for once again trying to derail a thread with Off Topic bizarre comments (or "crazy shit" as an ignorant like you would say)...and spamming it with two nearly identical posts....mr famous

Edit...and sorry if I offended you when I said "the cool/GTA style of RL losers  (no offence, and anyway In Game winners)", was not my intention, especially since I think you are not even a winner in this game...there are other things in life though, I can assure you this.

Regards
HG
14
....
Anyone who says killing terrorists won't the solve the problem, it will only create more, obviously hasn't tried hard enough

It is well know that initially there were no Islamists in either Iraq, Syria or Libya as these countries were secular anti Islamic governments, some of them even naively cooperated with the US-Uk with "extraordinary renditions" etc. to torture/kidnap Islamists.

The NeoCons (aided as usual by the US/Western MSM) started to sleepwalk the average US clueless Joe into a war frenzy telling him that Saddam was allied to AlQeda, that Assad was suppressing "the people" and other well orchestrated crap....

All this (as usual) with NO benefits for the average American, but certainly pleasing:

1) Israel, that requires constant civil wars/infighting in its neighbourhood to divert the attention from itself

2) Saudi, the well known creators and financiers of the Islamists, but a country that happen to be another "friend" of the US and a big money splashier in the uber corrupt US Swamp.

So NO...the bombs were used against the ANTI Islamists, for the CIA/DeepState childish "creative chaos" project...but given the immaturity and utter ignorance of the Yanks in charge, they ended up looking like the job of a bloody and left handed "apprentice sorcerer".

TLDR: US should stop ALL wars/interventions/influence on the world...the only thing they achieve is utter chaos, death and good scripts for a delusional Hollywood.

Regards
HG
15
General Discussion / Re: Any changes to bunnyjumping?

Well sadly, until BH is gone, I know 4 guys I game with regularly that said BH is a make or break deal for them and their decision to ever come back and invest time in the game. These are fellow DF1 vets , I talk to on a daily basis still. I would imagine if my core group of friends, has 4/5  that say BH is an issue keeping them from coming back, there are many others out there with similar thoughts, that do not lurk these forums and post feedback.

Greetings,

You can tell them that HG was probably the most vocal and relentless critic of BH, on DFO, DFUW, ROA, irritating very much the cool/GTA style of RL losers  (no offence, and anyway In Game winners) that thrive on this game breaking crap... but after trying how it has been nerfed/fine tuned in DnD he does not find it such a big issue any more at all

Regards
HG